Saturday, July 04, 2009

The Fourth Estate is Dying

By Diane M. Grassi

It was on June 21, 1788 that the United States Constitution was officially adopted with its ratification. And it was at that time that its ratification was contingent upon suggested changes be made to the Constitution, thereafter.

Leading up to the Constitution becoming effective, there were numerous debates among the states, namely that the Constitution did not go far enough in protecting personal rights and liberties and would provide for a necessary buffer from infringement by the government on the fundamental rights of the people.

The document simply failed to specify what fundamental rights would be protected from abuse of power, by the federal government and especially in times of emergency.

And it was in the first session of Congress in 1789 in which 12 amendments were proposed of which 10 were ultimately ratified on December 15, 1791. These amendments became known as the Bill of Rights.

The people were rightfully concerned that the Constitution must remain true to its intent; to prevent the misuse of its powers and to protect those very fundamental rights it was charged to protect.

Not the least of such rights was Amendment 1, and its often referenced freedom-of-speech clause. Its main purpose is to provide protection or a deterrent against censorship by the government and its officials. And it is implicit that the First Amendment be invulnerable when a law or government action is at issue.

And it is crucial that the press remains the watchdog of the people, in order to help decipher fact from fiction and for it to report the facts.

If we fast-forward 250 years, we still have two Houses of Congress, more unaccountable than any time in our history, an Executive Branch, creating its own shadow government within the very walls of the White House, and a judicial branch which has evolved into an activist judiciary. And most unfortunately, we have a press corps, a/k/a the media, which no longer remains accountable to the people and at every turn fails to remain objective in its reportage.

It was Thomas Jefferson who noted in 1799 that, “Our citizens may be deceived for awhile, and have been deceived; but as long as the presses can be protected, we may trust to them for light.”

But sadly on June 24, 2009, in perhaps the most egregious exercise in blurring the lines between fact and fiction. ABC News, one of the three largest news broadcasting networks in the U.S. and throughout the world, broadcasted its programming from the Blue Room in the East Wing of the White House.

But even more stunning and unprecedented in White House history, it broadcast a prime time special titled, Questions for the President: Prescription for America, an ABC News production. President Obama answered questions, pre-selected, pre-scripted and censored, by ABC News and the White House.

The intent was to “inform” the people of Obama’s new healthcare plan, which has not been seen nor discussed by the Congress, in an open forum, and remains a mystery as to its details, not publicly disclosed. No opposition questions or representation of any ideas other than those of Obama’s, ABC’s or the Democratic Party were permitted.

So essentially, conservatives and Republican lawmakers felt justified referring to it as a paid infomercial, not a “news” program. Usurping the Congress and the will of the people is anathema to abuse of power.

The nationalization of U.S. healthcare, as important and personal a matter as it is to every American has now been hijacked, along with the public’s airwaves. If Obama’s intentions for the American people cannot withstand honest and unscripted dialog and discourse but rather necessitates an imposter shilling as a news network, then it will fail the American people.

But do remember if you decided to tune in on Wednesday, that, “The most effectual engines for pacifying a nation are the public papers…A despotic government always keeps a kind of standing army of news writers who, without any regard to truth or to what should be like truth, invent and put into the papers whatever might serve the ministers. This suffices with the mass of the people who have no means of distinguishing the false from the true paragraphs of a newspaper.” – Thomas Jefferson (1816)

Copyright ©2009 Diane M. Grassi
Contact: dgrassi@cox.net

Shut Car Dealers Impact Tomorrow's Baseball

By Diane M. Grassi

“See the USA in your Chevrolet...,” was once as much a theme song for the American leisure lifestyle as it was an advertisement for one of General Motor’s (GM) most celebrated automobiles. And not to be overlooked is the relationship that the auto industry, and more specifically GM, has forged with Major League Baseball (MLB) over the past many decades.

In the mid-1970’s it was “Baseball, Hot dogs, Apple Pie and Chevrolet,” in a then-famous multi-faceted advertising campaign and jingle, and it was updated again in 2006 to accommodate the times.

The point of such Memory Lane nostalgia is to impart that the relationship between the auto industry and MLB began most historically with the advent of television broadcasts of games and the booming car industry sales of the 1950’s.

But further to corporate relationships and revenues is the importance of car sales at the local level, otherwise known as the car dealership. And over the years, from small towns to large, they have been bedrocks of their communities along the byways and across the highways.

For dealerships, and their respective service departments, provide payroll taxes, sales tax revenue, pay real estate and property taxes, pay state and local income taxes, among other required government fees and obligations, to their local governments. And equally important, they provide employment that provides health insurance, pension and other benefits for their many employees.

On May 14, 2009, Chrysler, LLC formally announced the immediate elimination 789 Chrysler dealerships nationwide. On May 15, 2009, GM formally announced the first 1,100 casualties of its expected 40% reduction of its dealerships or over 2,600 expected before the end of 2010. In addition, 2000 GM Pontiac dealerships were permanently ordered shuttered, as Pontiacs will no longer be manufactured again.

Unfortunately, Chrysler’s dealerships had only until June 9, 2009 to fire staff, sell off inventory and parts and to notify its customers with vehicles under warranty that they are going out of business. GM, at least, is allowing its dealers far more time to wind down operations, sell off inventory, advise customers and give the unemployed a leg up. All of this is of course taking place when these jobs, which are not expected to return, impact entire towns in some cases, during the worst “recession” since the Great Depression of the 1930’s.

There could have been a temporary reprieve for Chrysler dealers, from an often disengaged U.S. Congress, by way of a legislative amendment to the Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2009. It would have preempted allocation of a second round of bailout funds recently promised Chrysler, unless they provided dealers with at least a 60-day notice to help sell off their inventory and to allow appropriate closure of sales operations. Unfortunately, this never came to pass.

So What Has This Got To Do With Baseball?

As previously noted, as loyalists to the community, historically car dealerships, by extension, have supported numerous other businesses; from local parts suppliers, to supporting local newspapers through advertising, to creating business for local proprietors through their employees.

Additionally, car dealerships have always maintained being major sponsors for charities within their communities. These include support for numerous extra-curricular school functions, recreation department activities, animal welfare causes, volunteer fire department programs and any number of fund raisers.

Most notably, Little League Baseball and various other youth baseball programs throughout the U.S. have been traditionally supported by car dealerships. It is a win-win as uniforms and T-shirts help with advertising for the car dealer and keeps it involved locally, while being a big part of financing the numerous expenses incurred to run local teams and to help keep kids active and out of trouble.

In parts of the U.S., a small town may have only one or two dealerships or authorized service centers for vehicles within a 100-200 mile radius. Therefore, the closure of a Chrysler or GM dealership could virtually take a whole town with it.

At a time when youth activities have already been compromised due to limited funding, since the crash of the economy in late 2008, the prospects for youth baseball and athletic activities of any kind have not been good. Transportation, team membership dues, and provisions for uniforms and equipment all require funds. And parents, many of whom who are unemployed, under-employed or fearful of becoming jobless, have been forced to put participation in organized sports for their youngsters on hold.

And as all charities compete for donations in these hard times, it is often sports and recreation which are the first to be stricken from the ledger as well, when it comes to businesses solicited for funding. And as if the auto industry was not hurting badly enough, GM will be closing all of it U.S. plants for 9 weeks this summer, and all of its suppliers will see down-time as well.

By 2011, there will be hundreds of thousands of U.S. auto industry workers joining the unemployed, and that does not include the businesses which profit as a direct result from either the U.S. auto industry or its employees.

Similarly, to other youth organized athletic programs, the Reviving Baseball in Inner Cities (RBI) organizations, in many cities throughout the U.S., are operating in the red. RBI provides organized baseball for youth, traditionally for middle school and high school boys, although a few are now including 6 -12 year olds.

Most RBI organizations are dependent upon most, if not all, of their budgets from their own fundraising efforts. MLB, although a sponsor of RBI, contributes minimally to RBI funding and functions more as an endorser of the program than anything else.

Ultimately, the success of any one RBI program is a labor of love by individuals within communities, and largely maintained by single mothers. Yet, transportation to and from games, equipment, uniforms, fees for coaches and umpires, food and drink, upkeep of fields – which very often is done by the parents – still are associated costs, similar to those of Little League Baseball.

Some have asked, “What about the youth baseball travel teams, AAU clubs and youth suburban leagues?” Well, this recession, as previously stated, is like no other since the Great Depression. Therefore, it has impacted all sectors of industry and all pay scales of workers, from Wall Street to every street in America.

As previously reported by this journalist in numerous documentations with respect to sponsorships being off throughout MLB in 2009, GM has ended relationships this season with the Pittsburgh Pirates, a community deeply hurting in this recession, the Detroit Tigers, Ground Zero for the auto industry implosion and even the New York Yankees – for whom there is probably not much sympathy these days.

As the result of struggling families, MLB stadium attendance thus far in 2009 for April and most of May is down nearly 6% nationally when compared to the same number of weeks into the 2008 season. Yet, with tickets in many cities still too costly for many, with less discretionary income available, that means less youngsters will be attending MLB games.

One industry that curiously has been spared in this recession is the business of government, from the Beltway and beyond, which keeps adding jobs. And also unlike previous recessions it has included intrusive government policies which have only led to more plant closures, car sales jobs lost and essentially the vaporization of the U.S. car industry, which will never be the same again.

Were the car business not so embedded in the American way of life, perhaps it would be less tragic, but its fallout will be felt for decades to come, on many levels, and few communities will be spared.

And with respect to MLB, it cannot be stated enough times that more than any other professional sports league it has enjoyed multi-billion dollar revenues of $6 – 7 billion dollars each of the last several years. Additionally, MLB Commissioner, Bud Selig, earned the highest salary of any professional sports league commissioner in each of the last several years; $15 million for 2006 and $18.5 million for 2007.

Selig’s 2008 income has yet to be publicly disclosed and may very well not be divulged, as MLB is not required to do so. In fact, Selig was furious when his 2007 salary was leaked to the press earlier this year.

Therefore, it would seem pertinent to MLB’s development and outreach, as it looks forward, that it should not just limit its focus to bottom lines, its number of sponsorships, its broadcast TV deals or escalating player salaries. For if MLB remains as shortsighted as it has been the past several years, not only will the younger generation of potential players and fans erode, but they will permanently vanish.

So too, that which once were dependable American vocations – jobs in both the auto industry’s factories and showrooms – are no longer givens.

And similarly, MLB’s future hangs in the balance. If children are no longer able to afford to play the game, unable to afford the cost of a stadium ticket or even unable to afford current and impending expensive pay-TV packages in order to even watch a game, since very few MLB games ever appear on network television anymore, baseball as we know it will become but a footnote in the history books.

And it would serve MLB well to reinvest in its future right now.

For MLB has gotten greedy, fat and lazy during Bud Selig’s reign, yet it has not gotten too big to fail, as it has already compromised its generations to come.

Copyright ©2009 Diane M. Grassi
Contact: dgrassi@cox.net

MLB Ramps Up Casino Sponsorships

By Diane M. Grassi


It was 30 years ago when baseball legend, Willie Mays, was banned from Major League Baseball (MLB). Four years later, NY Yankee great, Mickey Mantle, met with the same fate as did Willie. And what was their supposed fall from grace? They each became promotional spokesmen for two Atlantic City casino hotels.

Willie Mays had a deal with the Park Place Casino – now Bally’s Park Place – and Mantle contracted with Del Webb’s Claridge Casino Hotel. The roles both played were as pitchmen for the resorts as they appeared in television and print ads for the respective properties.

At the time, it was MLB Commissioner, Bowie Kuhn, who made both then Hall of Famers “permanently ineligible” to participate in any capacity with MLB. In 1985, after Kuhn’s retirement, then newly appointed Commissioner Peter Ueberroth exonerated both Mays and Mantle, thereby lifting their banishment. Ueberroth proclaimed, “A lot of people will misinterpret my position as being soft on gambling. My stance is as strong as any Commissioner’s going back to Judge Landis. But there’s a need for new rules.”

And the argument could be made back then that both Mays and Mantle were not front-men for gambling, but rather were promoting entertainment interests of hotel resorts.

Fast forward to sometime around 2006 when MLB supposedly relaxed its rule on permitting direct relationships with gambling casino interests and its MLB teams. However, most such deals blossomed for this year’s 2009 baseball season that includes large casino hotel properties as well as many lucrative agreements with Indian reservation hotel casinos.

Sponsorships and the financing of such throughout professional sports as well as amateur athletics are drying up by virtue of the worst recession in 70 years. Added to that is the negative public perception that corporations receiving federal tax bailout dollars should not be dabbling in multi-million dollar contracts for advertising at sports venues nor buying skyboxes and over-priced season tickets at stadiums.

However, there now appears to be a new revenue stream, largely untapped, yet quickly assembled by many MLB teams and with Commissioner Bud Selig’s blessings. But in order to fully appreciate the precariousness of such contracts that MLB has already approved, it is helpful to revisit MLB Rule 21:

(a) Any player or person connected with a club….or who being solicited by any person, shall fail to inform his Major League President and the Commissioner
(d) Any player, umpire, or club or league official or employee, who shall bet any sum whatsoever upon any baseball game in connection with which the bettor has a duty to perform, shall be declared “permanently ineligible.”

And now the question must be asked. How does MLB oversee such sponsorships between MLB teams and those casino operations which allow legal sports betting on their premises, such as Harrah’s Entertainment, which has become a major sponsor for the NY Mets’ new Citi Field, most prominent in its outfield stands?

Harrah’s is now a Signature Partner of the Mets and has a 12,000 square foot 900 seat capacity full-service restaurant called the Caesar Club. Harrah’s hopes to recreate the atmosphere it provides at its Caesar’s Atlantic City property. Harrah’s will also benefit from naming and branding rights and orchestrate theme nights for baseball fans throughout the season.

It is important to note that Harrah’s casino hotel properties that it owns in Las Vegas, such as Caesar’s Palace, the Flamingo Hotel and Casino, Bally’s and its Rio Hotel and Casino which is host to the World Series of Poker, among others, all have sports books where sports betting on all professional and amateur sports is legal. And such includes sports betting on MLB.


At the new Yankee Stadium, the Mohegan Sun Hotel & Casino also has a presence in its center field stands. Its Mohegan Sports Bar is a 4,900 square foot full-service restaurant with major signage and a naming rights deal with the Yankees. In addition, Seminole Hard Rock Entertainment will own and operate the NYY Steak restaurant as well as the stadium’s new Hard Rock Café. The Seminole Nation is the primary proprietor of all Hard Rock Café and hotel casino properties worldwide, with the exception of the Hard Rock Hotel and Casinos in both Las Vegas and London.

The casino sponsorships for both the Yankees and the Mets are quite lucrative and in the millions of dollars, although MLB clubs do not necessarily accurately disclose the amount of their sponsorships, nor are they required to do so. But the NY teams are hardly in the minority when it comes to lining up for casino riches in the form of sponsorships. The Milwaukee Brewers inked a deal over the winter with the Potawatomi Bingo Casino of the Potawatomi Tribe.

The Brewer’s deal with the Potawatomi Tribe is just second to its deal with Miller-Coors Beer. And in MLB’s logic according to MLB’s Chief Operating Officer, Bob DuPuy, “There is no sports book associated with Potawatomi and casino gambling is now part of the entertainment landscape in 40-plus states and a number of clubs have had advertising and sponsorship relationships with local casinos.”

Perhaps DuPuy does not realize that Harrah’s is in the sports betting industry?

In Detroit there appears to be a long-standing conflict of interest with respect to the ownership of the Detroit Tigers as well as the Motor City Casino, purchased by Ilitch Holdings, Inc. in 2005, which purportedly owns both entities simultaneously.

Michael Ilitch and his wife, Marion Ilitch, are listed as the Tigers’ owner and the Motor City Casino owner, respectively. The question arose when it was revealed that Marion Ilitch is Vice Chairman of Ilitch Holdings, Inc. which also owns the Detroit Tigers. But Ilitch friend and Commissioner Bud Selig overlooked the proprietary conflict and asked his staff to stand-down.

There is indeed no shortage of casino sponsorships throughout the major and minor leagues of baseball. The Atlanta Braves, the Arizona Diamondbacks, the Los Angeles Angels, the Los Angeles Dodgers, the Florida Marlins and the Chicago Cubs all have contractual sponsorships with Indian casinos, gambling interests or state lotteries.

So what impact does this state of affairs have on the “best interests of baseball?” One could say that it was precipitated by Commissioner Ueberroth’s comments“…there’s a need for new rules.” Or did Bud Selig’s multi-billion dollar empire become too greedy for MLB’s own good by accepting a strong presence of gambling partnerships throughout the leagues? Has the appetite for big bucks clouded Selig’s judgment and has he crossed the line?

For MLB must be careful not to step on that 3rd rail; that which endangers its integrity. After all, MLB itself has already gambled on fan loyalty after nearly 20 years of the Steroid Era, also on Selig’s watch.

And finally, if the apparent overlap between gambling interests and MLB is not clear to the MLB Commissioner, then why is he so clear on keeping Pete Rose “permanently ineligible” and forever denying his chance of realizing his place in the Baseball Hall of Fame?


Copyright ©2009 Diane M. Grassi
Contact: dgrassi@cox.net